What Sells More: Naked man or Naked Harry?

 

A naked man is a naked man until he is royalty than he's called naked Harry.

I have seen the entire hassle made by the press over the “compromising” pictures of Prince Harry taken in Vegas this week. What exactly is the problem? I mean the guy went there to have some fun and ended up in Adam’s suit protecting a wannabe Eve and bam the next day he’s all over the news. 

The televisions are flashing; newspapers are throwing their former headlines to make room for the “unbelievable pictures of price Harry” and as a consequence the entire planet wants to see HIM naked. Why??? Why seeing a man without clothes is soooo important, soooo necessary as to shift everyone’s attention even for a couple of minutes from what is really necessary to report and debate. Apparently adding Prince after naked makes money pour regardless of the context.

Ever since the ink hit the paper the aftermath reactions have been flooding everyone’s ears and I guess will continue for a long time. Like always tabloids started making assumptions: “The photos have potential implications for the Prince's image representing Britain around the world”; “There are questions over his security during the Las Vegas holiday. Questions as to whether his position in the army might be affected. Further, we believe Harry has compromised his own privacy." 

WHAT??? His image will never be affected. His security is probably stronger than ever and his privacy will again be breached when he consents it. My opinion is that Harry got together with some guys and girls in Vegas, probably people he met there and wanted to spend an ordinary night like a normal human been. Unfortunately for him among the crowd there was a he or a she who sold the quality time he/she had for a couple of bucks. Shame on them! 

Apparently the saying what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas doesn’t apply to all. Look at the bright side Harry, at least you didn't end up with a herpes :D!